Body Fat Is More Important Than Body Mass Index

The obesity epidemic may be much worse than even the dismal statistics describe. Body mass index under-measures obesity; body fat is more important than body mass index.

Among white men over the age of 20, the combined rate of overweight (body mass index, or BMI ≥25) and obesity (BMI ≥30), is 75%. (ref.)

But that statistic is based on Body Mass Index, a flawed measure of obesity.

Why is it flawed? Because the health effects of obesity and overweight are due to increased fat, not weight itself.

BMI can be flawed in the direction of overdiagnosing obesity when someone carries a lot of muscle and little fat. For example bodybuilders and athletes in sports where body weight is an advantage may have a BMI putting them into the overweight/obese category, when in reality they’re perfectly healthy. How many people are overdiagnosed with obesity that way? My guess is a small, single-digit percent.

BMI is quite a bit more flawed in the other direction, that is, it often under-diagnoses obesity. The reason is that many people have little muscle, so while they may technically have a normal weight, they have too much body fat. They’re skinny-fat. This is the condition of normal-weight obesity.

How often does BMI under-diagnose obesity?

To discover how often BMI diagnoses obesity, we need to know what true obesity is. That must be defined in terms of body fat.

The American Society of Bariatric Physicians, a group that specializes in weight loss, defines obesity as ≥ 25% body fat for men, and ≥ 30% for women. At that level, this doctors’ group considers you eligible for medical obesity treatment.

Body fat can be measured by the DEXA scan. Since it requires special equipment, it’s more difficult than measuring BMI, which requires only height and weight.

When body fat is measured and compared to BMI, a large number of people are seen to be misclassified as non-obese based on BMI.

The following chart shows how many were underdiagnosed with obesity, by age and sex. Older women were especially likely to be underdiagnosed.

 

thumbnail

For the age group of men who read this site, somewhere between 15 and 35% are obese with a BMI of <30.

The researchers who did this study suggest that obesity in men be defined at a cut-off point of a BMI of 28, rather than 30. For women, they suggest 24. That means that a whole lot more people are obese than thought, and that the obesity epidemic is even worse than thought.

It’s difficult to arrive at an exact number, but if we use a ballpark figure of about 30% underdiagnosis for both men and women, we might get the following:

Non-obese for both sexes and all ages above 20 is about 65%. If 30% of them are in reality obese, then only about 50% of the population is non-obese, and 50% are obese.

It gets worse when we add in the merely overweight. In that case, the combined rate of overweight and obesity is 67%. Whether those with a normal BMI would be diagnosed as being overweight via DEXA body fat measurement at the same rate as the obese is unknown. The rate could be lower, or higher. Let’s use the same.

Combined non-overweight and non-obese percentage is 33%. If 30% are underdiagnosed, then only about 25% are in reality non-overweight and non-obese. For men over the age of 20 alone, it might be under 20%.

The combined overweight and obese fraction of the population may be 75%. For men, that figure may be 80%.

A healthy weight means a healthy body composition

Unfortunately, ideal body fat percentages are unknown, and must be guessed.

The American Council on Exercise suggests the following:

General Body-fat Percentage Categories

The category “average” probably corresponds to a BMI of overweight. So to be lean and healthy, a man would want a body fat percent of 17 or under.

A site that specializes in being lean suggests that the ideal body fat for a 20-year-old man is 8.5%, but rises to 20.9% at age 55. I have to call BS on that. The relation between body fat and health doesn’t change with age. Leaner is, other things equal, better. The idea that higher body fat is acceptable on older men just assumes that they either can’t or won’t lower their body fat, and that this must be accepted. That does not make it healthy.

To see how you’re really doing in terms of body composition and weight requires a DEXA scan or other decent measure of body fat.

In normal weight people with a BMI below 25, body fat strongly predicted cardiometabolic risk. Subjects were divided into tertiles (thirds) of body fat percentage; for men, the tertiles were:

  • low, ≤15.2%
  • medium, 15.3–20.7%%
  • high, ≥20.8%

The high tertile had nearly triple the prevalence of metabolic risk as the low. The medium had about 60% higher risk prevalence.

So even at a normal weight, body fat predicts health risk, a risk that weight or BMI alone does not predict.

Conclusion

Body composition, including body fat percentage, matters a lot. Indeed, actual weight or body mass index doesn’t matter at all; they are only proxies for body composition, and they appear to be rather poor ones. BMI is used so much primarily because it’s easy to measure.

Even if you’re of normal weight, you should have some idea of your body fat percentage. Measuring your waist circumference is one quick way to know whether you need to lose fat.

As with so many of life’s problems, this one is solved by cutting carbohydrates, and lifting weights.

PS: Lose fat and gain muscle. Read my book, Muscle Up.

PPS: You can support this site by purchasing through my Supplements Buying Guide for Men. No extra cost to you.

image_pdfimage_print

Leave a Comment:

17 comments
Body Fat Is More Important Than Body Mass Index says December 7, 2016

[…] Original Article: Body Fat Is More Important Than Body Mass Index […]

Reply
Erik Williams says December 7, 2016

Great article.

Do you have a recommended way to measure body fat percentage? It seems most methods are not too accurate.

Reply
    P. D. Mangan says December 7, 2016

    Thanks, Erik. As far as i know, the DEXA scan is the gold standard.

    Reply
    Justin Case says December 7, 2016

    If you are looking for cheap and easy, just buy some body fat calipers and use the 3 pinch (chest, abdomen, leg) measurements. Download an app and keep track of it. Definitely better than BMI.

    Reply
    David says December 8, 2016

    I have a Withings scale that supposedly gives your boy fat percentage when you climb on it. I think the measurement method has to do with sending some very low electrical current in your body through your feet.
    Does anyone knows how accurate this method is ?

    Thanks.

    Reply
      P. D. Mangan says December 8, 2016

      I understand that accuracy may not be best, but comparison of yourself over time can give you a good idea of which way you’re heading, up or down. Back when I was a marathon runner, one of those devices gave me a reading in the low single digits, and I doubt that was accurate.

      Reply
louis sir says December 8, 2016

interesting link on your twitters, that surgically removing visceral fat is actually beneficial to lifespan. albeit not as bad a CR.

Reply
brbr says December 9, 2016

This may be a little bit off-topic, but my wife made a gastric bypass and is wondering why isn’t she losing as much weight as others who did the same (she claims some people lose something like 20 kilograms or more in 15 days) and she just lost something like 7 or 8 kg in this 15 days period. Is she being hysteric about instant results or does she have a point?

Thank you for the good work.

Reply
    P. D. Mangan says December 9, 2016

    Hi brbr, I don’t know a lot about gastric surgery, but I’d say 7-8 kg in 15 days is a hell of a lot, and 15-20 is very unrealistic. After a kg or 2 of water weight, the fat comes off slowly in any diet, even pure fasting; I don’t think I’d expect more than a couple kg a week at most.

    Whether she’s being hysterical is your call 😉

    Reply
Belly Fat Promotes Aging - Rogue Health and Fitness says December 11, 2016

[…] Visceral fat refers to body fat that is stored inside the abdominal cavity, around the internal organs (viscera), and it has uniquely harmful effects on health. For example, in older women, the ratio of waist to hip circumference is “strongly and positively associated with mortality in a dose-response manner“, and is a better marker of mortality and health risks than body mass index. […]

Reply
sfer says December 28, 2016

This is definitely true but the reason people stick with the BMI is because it is easy.

Reply
FrankT says January 8, 2017

The gold standard for measuring body fat in men is a selfie while flexing your stomach, then submit to someone who tell the truth. If you have a visible six-pack, you are lean. Not sure if this test works for women. You could also judge yourself, but that may not work in this age of lowered standards where everyone has been told he/she is “perfect just as you are” and people see what they want to see.

Reply
Anti-Aging Studies Are Seriously Compromised - Rogue Health and Fitness says February 20, 2017

[…] majority of Americans, about 80%, are not 100% healthy and suffer from chronic health problems to one degree or another. If a diet, […]

Reply
Rudy Dew says March 26, 2017

Hi, What do you think is the best way to measure body fat percentage for the average guy?
Options for me are : take a dexa scan every few months, use calipers, BIA scales, any other method?

Reply
    P. D. Mangan says March 26, 2017

    Dexa is the gold standard, costs money though. Scales seem to have good relative, but not absolute, accuracy.

    Reply
The Deep Soy State - Rogue Health and Fitness says May 3, 2017

[…] a combined rate of overweight and obesity that approaches 80%, higher than the official figure, bad enough in itself, of 70%; […]

Reply
How to Prevent Cancer - Rogue Health and Fitness says May 15, 2017

[…] have a relatively high risk of developing cancer. Given what we know about the relation between body mass index and aging and health, I suspect that cancer incidence rises monotonically with BMI. In other words, other […]

Reply
Add Your Reply