Don’t be a victim of muscle loss

Unless you take active steps, you will lose muscle

One of the striking facts about men as we age is that we become less manly: we lose the vigor associated with young men, we decline in the hormone, testosterone, that makes us men, and we lose large amounts of the muscle mass that so obviously characterizes male bodies. All of these are associated with increases in body fat, insulin resistance, and a decline in exercise capacity.

To avoid the pitfalls and perils of aging and the diseases that go with it, it is imperative to retain muscle, and along with it the hormones and energy that characterize a fit man, whether he’s old or not.

A paper published a few years ago looked at the effects of testosterone and growth hormone therapy on lean mass and fat mass in men, average age 70: Testosterone and Growth Hormone Improve Body Composition and Muscle Performance in Older Men. (Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.) This study is far more interesting for what it means to be a sedentary old man than for the effects of testosterone and HGH, which are about what you’d expect.

The average muscle loss in men between the ages of 50 and 70 is 30% (from the paper), and from ages 70 to 80, another 20 to 30% of muscle is lost. Add those figures and you’ve got the basis for the fact that most 80-year-old men will have lost 50% of their muscle mass.

Testosterone and growth hormone supplementation increase muscle mass, decrease fat mass

 

The men were randomized to receive transdermal testosterone, 5 or 10 g/d, along with growth hormone, 0, 3, or 5 μg/kg per day, for 16 weeks.

The men in the study had a testosterone level of less than 550 ng/dl, which is interesting and important for the study and for the point I’m going to make, since if you were to see a doctor with a T level much above 300, you’d be lucky to get a scrip. A level of 550 would be considered perfectly normal, even in a much younger man.

The men also had serum IGF-1 levels in the lower tertile of adult male levels.

As I said, the T and HGH supplementation did about what you’d expect. The men getting T at 10 g/d along with growth hormone at 5 μg/kg per day – the highest doses – had the maximum results, gaining lean mass to the tune of nearly 3 kg (6.6 lbs), and losing fat mass of nearly 2.5 kg (5.5 lbs). That was in 4 months time, with no exercise.

Great results, right?

These men were sedentary, ate wrong, and out of shape

But how much of these men having low T and IGF-1 levels, along with being overweight (BMI 27.4) was more a result of not only being old, but sedentary and eating wrong? I believe that the lifestyle factors of diet and exercise have everything to do with it.

Consider the lean mass gains and fat mass losses of the best performing group. I could take a newbie weightlifter, even one who is 70 years old, and put him on a diet and training program through which he would easily gain 6.6 lbs of muscle and lose 5.5 lbs of fat in 4 months. When I started lifting – admittedly at age 55, not 70 – I put on 30 lbs of muscle in the first 9 months, and 35 in a year. I didn’t have much fat to lose, so I didn’t. And I’m no gifted athlete: I merely trained consistently and correctly, and ate my fill of a low-carb, paleo-style diet, allowing myself occasional cheats, like baked potatoes and alcohol. I did a few weight-gain tricks, like drinking 8-ounce glasses of half-and-half.

Likewise, the men’s exceedingly low IGF-1 levels may have been caused by a poor diet, filled with junky refined carbs and lacking in protein.

How do I know that these men had poor diets? Because almost everyone does.

The point being, these men had let themselves go.

Now, there’s a circular quality to these hormones and the condition these men were in. Obesity will lower your T levels, but lowering T levels can make you obese. Similarly, lowering your muscle mass through aging and no exercise will lower growth hormone, but lowering growth hormone also has adverse effects.

But I have no doubt that, absent debilitating injuries or illness, the 70-year-old men in this study need never have gotten into such shape, and they may very well not have needed the hormonal intervention just to keep themselves from falling apart.

And to be clear, I have nothing against testosterone replacement therapy, and I take a T booster myself. Growth hormone is another ball of wax, and likely is a pro-aging hormone, but far be it from me to say that it should never be used. Just be aware of its possible side effects.

Don’t be a victim of muscle loss, it can kill you

These 70-year-old men were in the beginning stages of frank sarcopenia, which could make their golden years a lot less golden, making them take refuge in a nursing home due to frailty, as well as shortening their lives.

You see old men all around who look like they’ve lost all zest for living: bent over, most of them overweight, no energy, looking forward to another night of crap food and TV.

It need not be that way.

PS: Check out my Supplements Buying Guide for Men.

image_pdfimage_print

Leave a Comment:

18 comments
Durandel Almiras says July 19, 2015

PDM, I take it growth hormone can be problematic for older men because cancer cells can make use of it?

I am having trouble finding the levels of T and HGH men should have. What’s also difficult to discover is if the numbers are averages or actual safe limits. Can you refer me to any good sources on actual numbers for T and HGH that is safe, rather than averages for age groups? I’m 35 and I want to talk to my doc about both. So far my physicality and activity suggest I’m high but my test scores are low. Though my doc thinks my numbers for my thyroid hormones…all of which are way off…is throwing off the T tests.

Reply
    P. D. Mangan says July 19, 2015

    Durandel, good questions. Yes, HGH can fuel the growth of cancer, but it also appears that raising IGF-1 levels, which is what HGH does, also generally conduces to aging, with possibly higher rates of heart disease and diabetes also. The anti-aging effects of fasting and calorie restriction appear to be due at least in part to lower IGF-1 levels.

    Laboratory ranges for normal values of any item of interest, such as T, are the range into which 95% of the apparently healthy population fits. Obviously, if T levels are very low in this population, and they and their doctors think that they’re healthy, this will skew the results way lower. Due to differences in receptors and other aspects of physiology, the same T level that works for one man may not work for another, so finding values for what a T level actually should be is going to be difficult. Ultimately, no one knows; T levels for example fall as men age: is that normal, or should levels be kept in the youthful range? Right now, most doctors would say something like, you’re 35, what do you expect? That’s not a very satisfying answer.

    Thyroid hormones are critically important, and that should be attended to. I take thyroid hormone myself, and have done so for 25 years. They make all the difference to health and to energy levels. Your thyroid levels may very well be affecting your T levels; fix them, and your problem might be solved.

    Reply
jrackell says July 19, 2015

So is it once the muscle fiber is gone it’s gone and can’t be gotten back? Your other article referenced cites loss of muscle fiber as being one of the main effects of sarcopenia. I guess what is confusing to me is the skinny guy who muscles up isn’t adding muscle fibers (since we have a fixed complement that doesn’t increase), but just bulking up the fibers he has. But it seems on the downhill slope we actually lose fiber (and hence your use of ‘retaining’ muscle fiber) — use it or lose it. I guess the moral is start weight training as early in life as possible.

Reply
Big Jim says July 20, 2015

Those xrays look like ham steaks.

Reply
Durandel Almiras says July 21, 2015

Thanks Mangan. I’ll deal with the thyroid issues and let you know what happens. I’m in FL, so the amount of endocrinologists is decent and hopefully I can find one or another doctor specialist who’ll help me on the testosterone levels. It is annoying how many think falling levels or even low levels are just fine. Low energy and dower mood is not a good place to hang out, especially when you can do something about it.

Is it just me, or is weird that no one bats an eye when large segments of the female population dope themselves with female hormones but people go batty when men want the right to dope with male hormones? Ridiculous.

Reply
sabril says July 22, 2015

It would be funny if it turned out that the optimal male BMI was 25.0 of higher.

Although I am not as pro-muscle as you, it does seem that people in their later years lose a good deal and it is quite detrimental to their overall health. I think it is probably underestimated how falls are dangerous and deadly to older people, i.e. that they can trigger a downward spiral where the person gets less exercise and degenerates further. I suspect that being under muscled for your size greatly increases the risk of falling.

Reply
    P. D. Mangan says July 22, 2015

    Yes, but of course the BMI is being used as a proxy for body fat percentage, so a higher BMI could be better as long as we specify that a lot of it is muscle. We actually couldn’t even say a low body fat percent is absolutely best, since that could be accompanied by not enough muscle. So optimal would probably be a higher BMI with low body fat.

    Reply
      sabril says July 23, 2015

      “Yes, but of course the BMI is being used as a proxy for body fat percentage, so a higher BMI could be better as long as we specify that a lot of it is muscle”

      Right that’s what I mean. The optimal level of muscularity and adiposity for man might very well result in a BMI over 25. For example Jack Lalanne was probably pretty close to optimal although perhaps a bit overmuscled.

      Reply
New book, "Muscle Up", coming soon - Rogue Health and Fitness says September 21, 2015

[…] because aerobic exercise has a poor record at fat loss and does nothing for or even accelerates sarcopenia, the loss of muscle with […]

Reply
How aerobic exercise causes fat gain and muscle loss - Rogue Health and Fitness says October 18, 2015

[…] humans get older, they lose muscle at a predictable rate if they don’t do anything about it. Between ages 50 and 70, most people will have lost 30% of […]

Reply
How I Plan to Reach 110 Years of Age - Rogue Health and Fitness says April 27, 2016

[…] loss begins at age 30 (though barely perceptible then) and by the time someone is 80, they’ve typically lost half their muscle. Muscle loss leads to insulin resistance, obesity, and […]

Reply
Weightlifting Is Anti-Aging - Rogue Health and Fitness says May 24, 2016

[…] an anti-aging intervention, weightlifting fights the loss of muscle (sarcopenia) that starts early in life, in the thirties, and maintains high insulin sensitivity, the loss of which is a main cause of the maladies of […]

Reply
The Low Testosterone and Obesity Vicious Cycle - Rogue Health and Fitness says August 10, 2016

[…] mass. Don’t think that because you’re young that you’re immune from muscle loss. Losing muscle begins when a man is in his thirties, and accelerates thereafter. By the time a man reaches 80, he typically will have lost a full 50% […]

Reply
Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators (SARMs) - Rogue Health and Fitness says August 23, 2016

[…] As people age, they lose muscle mass, and if this goes on long enough, sarcopenia, or muscle-wasting, develops. The only difference between normal muscle loss and sarcopenia is the degree to which muscle has been lost. […]

Reply
Five Ways to Be in the Top 10% of Men - Rogue Health and Fitness says September 14, 2016

[…] you’re older (like me), it’s even easier. Most men (and women) lose a lot of muscle by the time that they’re older, the extreme case being sarcopenia, or muscle-wasting. Lift weights with any kind of regularity and […]

Reply
Brief Workouts Produce Significant Strength Gains - Rogue Health and Fitness says September 25, 2016

[…] people especially need strength training, since they lose muscle with age. Getting these people into the gym can greatly improve their […]

Reply
Muscle, Fat, and Weight Loss - Rogue Health and Fitness says January 3, 2017

[…] One reason for increasing obesity with age is said to be muscle loss, which almost always occurs when people get older. […]

Reply
Why Older Men Should Lift Weights - Rogue Health and Fitness says May 28, 2017

[…] means loss of muscle. Men at the age of 80 have typically lost 50% of the muscle they had in youth. Let me emphasize – 50%. That sad statistic shows why strength training is crucial, and why […]

Reply
Add Your Reply