Knowledge and Action Are Needed to Change

Both knowledge and action are needed for change. What does that mean exactly? If you want to change, you must know the right steps to take, but you must also be willing to put that knowledge into action. Both are required.

Knowledge

Suppose you’re overweight or obese, and you decide to lose weight. To change yourself. You go to your doctor and ask him how to do this. Will that help?

Probably not. A study of U.S. physicians found that, in their sample (498 physicians), 53% were overweight or obese.

That means that more than half of doctors either don’t know how to lose weight, or lack the will to do so. Given the intense drive and ambition required of people to become physicians, lack of knowledge seems more likely.

If you check the internet or popular diet books, many of these won’t have the right knowledge either. If they did, one wouldn’t expect a combined overweight/obesity rate of 70%.

The same principle applies to many other areas of life which you might want to change. Generally, the more universal the problem that needs addressing, the more different the opinions you’ll find and the more likely it is that those opinions will be wrong; that is, they’ll have little relation to reality and won’t help you solve the problem.

Some examples of areas where you’re likely to get bad information:

  • dating and sex relations
  • physical fitness
  • healthy food
  • education
  • dressing well.

There are at a couple of reasons that sources may be unreliable: they genuinely don’t know the right answers; or they act out of self-interest, i.e. they’re corrupt.

Many sources genuinely don’t know the right answers. Take the matter of healthy food. For several decades now, medical authorities have told us to eat a low-fat diet for health. It will keep our cholesterol levels low and thus prevent heart disease, they’ve said. But it turns out that low-fat diets are associated with higher death rates. Oops.

Other sources of information are corrupt.

Take the matter of college education. Asking a college counselor if you need more education is like asking a barber if you need a haircut. Counselors and other college officials are simply not going to recommend that you don’t need their expensive product, despite the fact that a a degree in gender studies is unlikely to get you a more exalted job than a Starbucks barista.

Corruption is rampant among health authorities too. Many doctors who recommend statins have lucrative ties to the drug industry. Can you believe their recommendations?

In other areas, self-interest isn’t necessarily financial. For instance, a man taking dating advice from a woman isn’t usually a good idea.

How does one discover whether information is correct or not?

There are a few signs to look for. For example, see whether the person or institution that provides the information benefits from providing it, directly or indirectly. While some will legitimately charge money for good information, if they benefit by telling the population in general to follow their instructions, then be suspicious.

If a source has financial ties to a recommended product, then be careful.

If a source has a bad track record in providing information or in making predictions, or no track record at all, then scrutinize it carefully.

Action

To change oneself, knowledge is not enough. All the knowledge in the world won’t help you if you’re unwilling to take action and use that knowledge.

Take the overweight or obese person. Assuming he obtains the right knowledge, putting it into practice requires effort and willpower. Reading a book doesn’t make fat melt away. When I tell people what I eat, the most common response is “I could never stop eating” whatever it is I tell them I don’t eat.

Likewise in other areas that you want to change.

Inertia is a strong influence in life. Most people prefer to do what they’ve always done. Habits become ingrained and change can be difficult.

Furthermore, you’re influenced by everyone around you. If they all do something one way, for instance if they all eat the same kind of food, dress a certain way, and generally live their lives a certain way, then you’re more likely to do that too.

Taking action to change something often requires going against the grain and thinking for yourself. If you worry about what others will think, you’re unlikely to make the change you want and need. So don’t care about what others think; they’re probably not thinking at all about you anyway. People are concerned about themselves, and the idea that you’ll be shunned is a phantom.

Only you can take responsibility for yourself and to change. No one else can do it.

Maybe life hasn’t been fair to you, although the concept of fairness applied to life is a dubious one. Even so, only you can make the change.

Conclusion

Skepticism is a virtue, but too much skepticism can be a vice. Be judicious in evaluating whether a source of information is reliable or not. Seek out experts, but scrutinize their integrity.

Take personal responsibility for enacting change. Blame others or circumstances all you want, but that won’t help you change.

PS: My most recent book is Best Supplements for Men.

PPS: Check out my Supplements Buying Guide for Men.

image_pdfimage_print

Leave a Comment:

10 comments
Mellie Walks says September 10, 2017

Excellent post! I agree wholeheartedly!

Reply
    P. D. Mangan says September 10, 2017

    Thanks, Mellie!

    Reply
Arnie McKinnis says September 11, 2017

Being comfortable is the enemy of progress. And humans, by their nature, are comfort seeking animals. Therefore, as you stated, it takes will power to make progress.

One thing I would add to the mix is “testing” (another way to look at it would be tracking and evaluating).
(1) research/info gathering
(2) acting or integrating
(3) tracking and analysis

Each of us is slightly different, and what works for one person 100% of the time, will work for another 50% of the time and other 0% of the time. Understanding how to gather information, integrate that information in small tests, and monitor the results – you start to figure out what for you and what doesn’t.

Great article PD (as always).

Reply
    P. D. Mangan says September 11, 2017

    Thanks, Arnie. Great comment.

    Reply
Matt says September 11, 2017

I love this, I share your philosophy. I had a life-changing moment around 10 years ago in college when a classics professor stopped a class to tell us that everything we were learning was useless if it didn’t lead to action, that we should never fetishize knowledge for its own sake but only insofar as it could be used as a tool to use in our lives. Now I maintain a spreadsheet of all the books I read, in which I write a small summary of the book and rate it on a 1-10 scale of how actionable it is.

This perspective has lead me to a point where I, someone with a disappointingly average intellect, have a much easier time converting information into action than my high IQ peers who can memorize and interpret incredible amounts of data but very rarely allow that potential energy out of their brains, e.g. my top 10% IQ peer who knows more about health and nutrition than 90% of the planet, can lecture and write on it endlessly, but is at least 50lbs overweight and eats most of his meals at Taco Bell and McDonalds. For him the whole game is in acquiring knowledge, for me it’s enacting it. Action is everything.

Reply
oil boy says September 12, 2017

I saw in another post which I can’t find how beef fat and ethanol don’t produce liver disease. I was wondering if there are any similarities with lard?

Great blog.

Reply
    P. D. Mangan says September 12, 2017

    Thanks. Yes, there are similarities, since lard has a lower proportion of polyunsaturated fat than seed oils, although it’s higher than beef fat.

    Reply
Parsons says September 12, 2017

Great article P.D., but there’s one area where you made a point obliquely which could have been made more directly and effectively (imho):

“In other areas, self-interest isn’t necessarily financial. For instance, a man taking dating advice from a woman isn’t usually a good idea.”

Say what you will about the Game writers, but one thing they were consistent and correct about is that if you want good advice as to how to become successful at something, take advice from those who are themselves successful at it. In regard to Game, it was don’t take advice from women, but rather from men who are themselves actually successful with women, but it goes for anything. One should take one’s lessons from those actually successful in the field.

Cheers.

Reply
    P. D. Mangan says September 13, 2017

    Thanks, Parsons, good point.

    Reply
Carpenter says September 24, 2017

This is true: One shouldn’t take dating advice from women. But why? First of all, they never had to think about it from a man’s perspective, so they generally don’t have good advice to give. Instead they’ll give you clichés: “Just be yourself!” (everyone already is that) and “You’ll find someone when you stop looking!” (then why hasn’t the guy found someone yet, by just sitting at home?). These are only meant to make the advice-giver look good – it’s the same as saying “See, I’m so attractive to others that I never needed to improve anything about myself, which is reflected in what kind of advice I give!” It is also to avoid admitting that the woman doesn’t actually have any practical advice. Plus, they consider any improvement of your approach to be a false portrayal of your value, so to give any such advice would be to betray other women.

Aside from these two platitudes, women might also say “Just smile and say hi”. If that was all you needed, then every man would get lucky every time, wouldn’t he? All these phrases are meant to have men serve themselves on a platter for women to choose from. This is because women – and many men – think that how well a man does in the dating scene is a direct reflection of his overall value. So if he would learn some basic dating tips, that would be “cheating,” as it would present a false view of his value.

But this is untrue. We are long past the time when women looked only at a man’s overall value – the time when the farmer’s boy or the shoemaker’s apprentice were chosen by a girl from a family on the same level. Today women want to be entertained in dating. They want excitement. A man’s ability to offer this is not a reflection of his value, but simply of dating skill. Some men are naturals at this, and do far better than others only because of their ability to charm. This is seen in the fact that almost all men have a lower number of sex partners than the average woman, but a few percent of men at the top drive up the average. The women flock to these men – for fun, before settling down. It is also seen in how in Tinder, a few percent of men get the attention of nearly all the women, while the rest of the men are left competing for the least attractive women.

Therefore, teaching men how to approach, how to charm, is not cheating. It is simply giving women what they want, but won’t admit. It is giving them what they otherwise get from only the few percent of men who are the most successful on the dating scene. Telling men that it is wrong to learn dating skills is to tell many of them to go months, even years, without dating or sex in their youth, which is downright painful. “You’ll find someone eventually!” Yes, they will, but that “eventually” can be far away, when the girls have had their fun. This is not something young men have to settle for. (Note: Yes, I know, not all girls act the way we see in the statistics mentioned above. But the majority do, which leaves slim pickings for many men.)

Reply
Add Your Reply